Failure To Provide Details Edinburgh

Kept Licence
Edinburgh Sheriff Court and Justice of the Peace Court

Our client was initially accused of speeding and thereafter of failing to disclose the details of the driver contrary to section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988.

The issue was that our client and his wife had been sharing the driving on a journey and were simply unable to recall who was driving at that particular time. Very properly, both their names and addresses were provided to the East Safety Camera Unit. Not satisfied with this response the matter was referred to the Procurator Fiscal's Office in Edinburgh for consideration of proceedings.

The case was deemed serious enough to warrant prosecution. We were engaged by our client at that stage. We identified a great number of technical defences to the charge. Aside from the technical defences the actual photographs of the incident were of such poor quality that it was difficult to identify the car let alone its occupants.

We contacted the Procurator Fiscal's Office in Edinburgh and had a meeting with two Procurators Fiscal and put our client's case to them. After careful consideration, they agreed with our legal submissions and decided to withdraw the prosecution with the effect that our client did not have to attend Court.

This case was negotiated by our Mr Simpson on 12th December 2018.

 Kept Licence!

Published: 12/12/2018

Need help with a similar case?

Contact Us

See also

Sheriff Rejects Police Evidence In Speeding Charge

Our client was accused of speeding at 101mph on the M74. Following a speeding trial the Sheriff decided that the police officers did not give credible or reliable evidence and found our client not guilty of the charge. Despite stating that he was very experienced, one road traffic officer claimed that he could not tell the Court the difference between a saloon and an estate car. This was a great result. There was no risk to our client's licence and was defended solely on a point of principle....